Mar 31, 2024

Edison Q1 2024 Earnings Report

Edison International reported a net loss and core earnings per share increased.

Key Takeaways

Edison International reported a first-quarter net loss of $11 million, or $0.03 per share. Core earnings were $438 million, or $1.13 per share. The company affirmed its 2024 core EPS guidance of $4.75-$5.05 and reiterated long-term core EPS growth rate targets of 5%-7% for 2021-2025 and 5%-7% for 2025-2028.

First-quarter GAAP loss per share was $0.03; core EPS was $1.13.

Strong regulatory progress was achieved with the receipt of the CEMA proposed decision and submission of GRC rebuttal testimony.

The best estimate of expected losses for 2017/2018 Wildfire/Mudslide Events was revised, resulting in a net after-tax charge of $333 million; the Woolsey application is on track for Q3.

2024 core EPS guidance of $4.75-$5.05 was affirmed.

Total Revenue
$4.08B
Previous year: $3.97B
+2.8%
EPS
$1.13
Previous year: $1.09
+3.7%
Gross Profit
$1.75B
Previous year: $1.56B
+12.1%
Cash and Equivalents
$992M
Previous year: $836M
+18.7%
Free Cash Flow
-$236M
Previous year: -$1.41B
-83.3%
Total Assets
$83.6B
Previous year: $78.9B
+6.0%

Edison

Edison

Forward Guidance

The company affirmed its earnings guidance range for 2024.

Positive Outlook

  • Affirms 2024 core EPS guidance of $4.75-$5.05
  • Reiterates long-term core EPS growth rate targets of 5%-7% for 2021-2025
  • Reiterates long-term core EPS growth rate targets of 5%-7% for 2025-2028
  • Confident in delivering on long-term EPS growth targets
  • Intends to seek full recovery of all eligible costs

Challenges Ahead

  • Revised best estimate of expected losses for 2017/2018 Wildfire/Mudslide Events, resulting in net after-tax charge of $333 million
  • Wildfires are now a national issue
  • Litigation outcomes outside of California are impacting the costs to resolve claims everywhere
  • Settlement outcomes during the quarter exceeded previously estimated values
  • Adverse jury verdicts in wildfire litigation against utilities outside of California and increasingly negative jury sentiments in general litigation